Yes, I know I'm beating a life-challenged horse, but, really, this is becoming ridiculous. Now Pat Forde, an ESPN columnist, is telling folks just how much Rick Marjerus deserves their support and admiration. Why? Because—wait for it, brace for it, get ready for it—he is a basketball coach who has opinions about important things. Wow. Bam. Home run! Touchdown! Can I sit down and have a cold one while I process this mind-altering information?
If Rick Majerus were like 95 percent of the men in his profession, he wouldn't have been anywhere near that Hillary Clinton rally last weekend.
Rick Majerus came to St. Louis in April after previous stops at Marquette, Ball State and Utah.
He would have been watching tape and pretending the real world didn't exist. He would have his political leanings stuffed so deep inside that nobody would know he cared about anything other than defending the pick-and-roll. And if a guy with a camera approached and asked him questions about abortion and stem-cell research, he would have dislocated his spine avoiding a direct answer.
But that's not Rick Majerus. He is that rarest of breeds: a coach with strong political beliefs and the guts to voice them.
Forde, whose writing I often enjoy, is too easily impressed. Why, just today I spoke to a hardworking homemaker, a budding fashion designer, and an aspiring young athlete who all expressed strong opinions about a wide variety of issues—and that was without ever leaving my own home (the three people are, respectively, my wife, my daughter, and my son). Big deal. Honestly, there are times when I listen to coaches talk about sports and I'm not impressed by their grasp of the sport they coach. And don't even get me started on how most sports pundits come across when they try to get deep and be socially conscious. Oops, too late!
Forde is quite taken with Marjerus the Lefty Martyr who bucks the system (the Church, to be specific), speaks his mind (using the sort of meaningless liberal clichés any college student has memorized by the second semester of their freshman year), and embraces controversial issues (again, wow. I'm so impres—yaaaawn.):
Difference of opinion -- and the thoughtful discussion of those opinions -- is supposed to be part and parcel of a university community. Even at a university with a religious affiliation. A campus with only one school of thought and one slice of the American demographic sounds like a pretty dull place.
And any campus that has Majerus on it never will be dull. Agree or disagree with his politics, but respect the fact that the big man's life is bigger than 84 feet by 50 feet.
He's an excellent basketball coach who took Utah on an improbable run to the 1998 national title game, but he's far more than that. He is intriguingly complex -- you probably can find as many Majerus critics as Majerus fans -- and never shallow. He wears his surgically repaired heart on his sleeve and puts his neck on the line for what he believes.
Ah, "intriguingly complex." Well, I'd take Forde's word for it, except that Marjerus hasn't said anything any different than a number of non-intriguing, non-complex, "Catholic" politicians have been saying for years:
"I believe in ending the war. I believe in gun control. I believe in stem-cell [research]. I believe in pro-choice. I respect that women need to make the decisions that are right for them, and I think it's wrong for people to speculate what they would do in a gut-wrenching, agonizing situation."
Is it just me, or it is strange that people who have simplistic views about war and guns (always bad, all the time, in every situation!) are always eager to talk about how complex and difficult abortion is and how it must always be the "woman's decision" (I've addressed that in a previous post, btw). Actually, there is a simple, connecting principle that should provide a basic guideline for all three issues: The taking of innocent life is always wrong. Always. "The inalienable right to life of every innocent human individual is a constitutive element of a civil society and its legislation" (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2273).
Finally, in case anyone missed it, Forde reminds readers once again of just how darned impressive it is that Marjerus has expressed his opinion about abortion and related matters:
We know Tiger Woods believes in Nike and Michael Jordan believes in Hanes and Peyton Manning believes in Gatorade, but we sure don't know how they vote or how they feel about societal issues. Same with the vast majority of the coaches who have become the stars of college basketball, pockets lined with shoe money and other endorsements. With Majerus, we know.
Yes, Tiger, how do you feel about This, That, and the Other Thing? Puke. Putting it bluntly, this is merely a blatant example of the Cult of Celebrity Coach Worship working overtime and out-of-bounds. After all, why is it that a basketball coach's feelings about serious moral issues should be given more weight than the beliefs of a Catholic bishop, theologian, and canon lawyer? (I'm guessing it has something to do with Forde being a sports writer, but perhaps I'm missing some intriguingly complex angle here.)
What Forde never discusses is the real issue: a Catholic coach at a Catholic school—who is, in many important ways, a Catholic educator—is actively and publicly (key word) espousing moral beliefs that are clearly contrary to Catholic teaching. Could it be that it is simply too complex of a topic for a sports writer to handle? Or is it that Forde believes that coaches trump the Church when it comes to addressing moral and ethical issues? Whatever the case, simply having an opinion is not grounds for being their personal cheerleader. At least that's my opinion...
Recent Comments