Is there a difference between an apologist and an apologizer?

FROM the EDITORS:

IMPORTANT INFORMATION:
Opinions expressed on the Insight Scoop weblog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions of Ignatius Press. Links on this weblog to articles do not necessarily imply agreement by the author or by Ignatius Press with the contents of the articles. Links are provided to foster discussion of important issues. Readers should make their own evaluations of the contents of such articles.

NEW & UPCOMING, available from IGNATIUS PRESS

Monday, December 12, 2011

Is there a difference between an apologist and an apologizer?

It's not just a question for Catholics, as NRO's Jonah Goldberg notes at The Corner:

I love this item from Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler. Romney says that Obama is going around the world apologizing for America. The headline: “Romney’s claim that Obama is an apologist for U.S. is based on distortions.”

Indeed!

An apologist is someone who zealously defends something, not someone who apologizes for its failures.

The WaPo piece has been corrected since Goldberg posted about it. But apparently no apology was made by fact-checker Kessler for confusing an apologist with an apologizer.

On a semi-related note, see my fact-checked essay, "Be A Catholic Apologist — Without Apology".

Posted by Carl E. Olson on Monday, December 12, 2011 at 12:01 AM | Permalink