"How did the beatification process assess John Paul II’s life?"

How does his record as pope bear on that assessment?

The purpose of this beatification process, as with any such process, was to determine whether the life under study was one of heroic virtue. Over 100 formal witnesses were consulted and the four-volume study includes their testimonies, as well as a biography of the late pope and an examination of what were termed “special questions” — issues that arose during the beatification process itself, such as the charge (likely planted by former Stasi operatives) that young Karol Wojtyla had been involved in the assassination of two Gestapo agents during World War II. The charge was ridiculous, and it was refuted.

Evidently, the overwhelming judgment of those responsible, including Pope Benedict XVI, was that this was indeed a life of heroic virtue. I think that judgment is correct. It doesn’t mean that, as pope, John Paul II got everything right. No pope does. The question is whether he made his decisions prudently, according to his best judgment, and without fear or favor. In The End and the Beginning, the second volume of my biography of John Paul II, I explored that question over some 90 pages. My judgment is that John Paul consistently used his best judgment, without fear or favor, even in decisions I think he got wrong.

3. What were the chief qualities of John Paul II? What were his principal faults?

John Paul II’s radical Christian discipleship, and his remarkable capacity to let that commitment shine through his words and actions, made Christianity interesting and compelling in a world that thought it had outgrown its “need” for religious faith. He was a man of extraordinary courage, the kind of courage that comes from a faith forged in reflection on Calvary and the murder of the Son of God. He demonstrated, against the cultural conventions of his time, that young people want to be challenged to live lives of heroism. He lifted up the dignity of the human person at a moment when the West was tempted to traipse blithely down the path to Huxley’s brave new world of manufactured and stunted humanity. And he proclaimed the universality of human rights in a way that helped bring down the greatest tyranny in human history.

He was, like many saintly people, too patient with the faults of others. His distaste for making a spectacle of anyone, and his willingness to give people a second, third, and fourth chance, were admirable human qualities that arguably worked against the efficiency of his governance.

Read the entire piece, "The John Paul II Beatificiation Catechism", by George Weigel, at NRO.com.

Books by George Weigel available through Ignatius Press:

• The End and the Beginning: Pope John Paul II - The Victory of Freedom, the Last Years, the Legacy
• Witness to Hope: The Biography of Pope John Paul II
• God's Choice: Pope Benedict XVI and the Future of the Catholic Church
• The Courage to be Catholic
• Cube and the Cathedral: Europe, America, and Politics Without God
• Letters To a Young Catholic

Comments

[Joe]

I want to believe Weigel, but his caricature ofT he raditionalist side rings a bit false. Also, he doesn't even engage the complaints offered by them in what is actually a pretty effective piece over at The Remnant (http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/2011-0331-statement-of-reservations-beatification.htm). If he really wants to address objections or questions, he ought to do so forthrightly, and not in a breezy dismissal. It would be helpful. One point particularly prescient for anyone familiar with parish life: "We must ask: Of what value is popular demand for this beatification in an epoch when the vast majority of nominal Catholics simply reject any teaching on faith and morals they deem unacceptable—above all the infallible teaching of the Magisterium on marriage and procreation?"

[Charles E Flynn]

The Remnant article is well worth reading, but does not take into account the fact that Karol Wojtyla (later Pope John Paul II) was very familiar with the Polish secret police tactic of planting false accusations against members of the Roman Catholic clergy. His experience with that tactic may have prejudiced Pope John Paul II when he was confronted with accusations against the clergy, including those against Maciel.

I hope that someone more familiar with the criteria for canonization than I am will comment on whether outstanding or deficient managerial ability is a major factor.