Bookmark and Share
My Photo

FROM the EDITORS:

  • IMPORTANT INFORMATION:
    Opinions expressed on the Insight Scoop weblog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions of Ignatius Press. Links on this weblog to articles do not necessarily imply agreement by the author or by Ignatius Press with the contents of the articles. Links are provided to foster discussion of important issues. Readers should make their own evaluations of the contents of such articles.

NEW & UPCOMING, available from IGNATIUS PRESS







































































« "Newman is rightly considered to be the father of the Catholic revival..." | Main | "It is a bad sign when the head of a Catholic college’s theology department ..." »

Friday, September 24, 2010

Comments

Ed Peters

Compare "The Tudors" on television now with "The Six Wives of Henry VIII" a generation ago.

You exactly nailed it.

Mark Brumley

Well-done. Sandra Miesel has a knack for debunking without succumbing to the temptation to white-washing Christian history. Christians aren't perfect. But usually the facts are contrary to how the anti-Christian polemicists have construed them. Sandra makes that clear.

Thomas S

Funny, I thought The Tudors actually made a respectable attempt at historical accuracy (at least concerning the BIG issues), and a shockingly favorable depiction of the Catholics for a network like Showtime.

David K. Monroe

The factual content in The Tudors seems to owe a lot to Alison Weir's The Six Wives Of Henry VIII - I think that Michael Hirst must have had a dog-eared copy of it at his side as he wrote the episodes - but the obvious conflations and fabrications and even errors (such as Henry being a head shorter than most of the rest of the cast, no insult intended to the fine actor who plays him) detract greatly from the authenticity of the presentation.

This is not to say that it's not great entertainment - I certainly enjoy the series - but some of the errors are so basic that it's hard for me to call it a respectable attempt at accuracy. Accuracy, as it usually is, takes a back seat to the drama.

You are correct about the positive portrayal of Catholics, but then in the series Henry is not so much the hero as he is the anti-hero, and as such Catholics come off as sympathetic as they are resisting his encroaching tyranny. If you want to see Hirst give Catholics the business, see his movies Elizabeth and Elizabeth: The Golden Age.

Thomas S

I agree much was conflated (even morphing multiple characters into one), but the larger historical threads (that interested me anyway) were fairly well done. Quibbling about the height of Henry is rather low on my radar (although I must say I thought that bit of casting was off the mark).

I wasn't aware the same man made the wretchedly offensive Elizabeth movies, which would have been a much more apt point of reference for this Hypatia comparison.

Sharon

Here are some other articles which compliment Sandra's excellent information.

Mike Flynn
The Life and Times of Hypatia of Alexandria

http://m-francis.livejournal.com/159500.html

http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/persecution/pch0251.htm
The Dangerous Silliness of the new movie Agora
Fr Robert Barron

http://www.wordonfire.org/WOF-TV/Commentaries-New/Fr--Barron-comments-on--Agora-.aspx

Fr Barron comments on Agora

The comments to this entry are closed.

Ignatius Insight

Twitter


Ignatius Press


Catholic World Report


WORTHY OF ATTENTION:




















Blogs & Sites We Like

June 2018

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Blog powered by Typepad