Praestat ut altare maius exstruatur a pariete seiunctum, ut facile circumiri et in
eo celebratio versus populum peragi possit. [It is better for the main altar to be constructed away
from the wall so that one can easily walk around the altar and celebrate facing the people.] [2]
It is only the possibility that is emphasized. And this [separation of the altar from
the wall] is not even prescribed, but is only recommended, as one will see if one looks at the Latin text of the
directive.... In the new instruction the general permission of such an altar layout is stressed only with regard to
possible obstacles or local restrictions. [3] Above all because for a living and participated liturgy, it is not indispensable that the altar should
be versus populum: in the Mass, the entire liturgy of the word is celebrated at the chair, ambo or lectern, and,
therefore, facing the assembly; as to the eucharistic liturgy, loudspeaker systems make participation feasible enough.
Secondly, hard thought should be given to the artistic and architectural question, this element in many places being
protected by rigorous civil laws. [4]
The Reform of the Liturgy and the Position of the Celebrant at the Altar | Uwe Michael Lang | From Turning
Towards the Lord: Orientation in Liturgical Prayer (2nd edition)
The reform of the Roman Rite
of Mass that was carried out after the Second Vatican Council has significantly altered the shape of Catholic worship.
One of the most evident changes was the construction of freestanding altars.
The versus populum celebration was
adopted throughout the Latin Church, and, with few exceptions, it has become the prevailing practice during Mass for the
celebrant to stand behind the altar facing the congregation. This uniformity has led to the widespread misunderstanding
that the priest's "turning his back on the people" is characteristic of the rite of Mass according to the
Missal of Pope Saint Pius V whereas the priest's "turning towards the people" belongs to the Novus Ordo
Mass of Pope Paul VI. It is also widely assumed by the general public that the celebration of Mass "facing the
people" is required, indeed even imposed, by the liturgical reform that was inaugurated by Vatican II.
However, the relevant conciliar and post-conciliar documents present quite a different picture. The Council's
Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy, Sacrosanctum Concilium, speaks neither of a celebration versus populum
nor of the setting up of new altars. In view of this fact it is all the more astonishing how rapidly "versus
populum altars" appeared in Catholic churches all over the world. [1] The instruction Inter
Oecumenici, prepared by the Consilium for the carrying out of the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy and
issued on September 26, 1964, has a chapter on the designing of new churches and altars that includes the following
paragraph:
It is said to be desirable to set up the main altar separate from the back wall, so that the priest can
walk around it easily and a celebration facing the people is possible. Josef Andreas Jungmann asks us to consider
this:
In a letter addressed to the heads of
bishops' conferences, dated January 25, 1966, Cardinal Giacomo Lercaro, the president of the Consilium, states
that regarding the renewal of altars "prudence must be our guide". He goes on to explain:
With reference to Cardinal Lercaro's exhortation
to prudence, Jungmann warns us not to make the option granted by the instruction into "an absolute demand, and
eventually a fashion, to which one succumbs without thinking". [5]
Inter Oecumenici
permits the Mass facing the people, but it does not prescribe it. As Louis Bouyer emphasized in 1967, that document does
not at all suggest that Mass facing the people is always the preferable form of Eucharistic celebration. [6] The rubrics
of the renewed Missale Romanum of Pope Paul VI presuppose a common direction of priest and people for the core of
the Eucharistic liturgy. This is indicated by the instruction that, at the Orate, fratres, the Pax
Domini, the Ecce, Agnus Dei, and the Ritus conclusionis, the priest should turn towards the
people. [7] This would seem to imply that beforehand priest and people were facing the same direction, that is,
towards the altar. At the priest's communion the rubrics say "ad altare versus", [8] which would be
redundant if the celebrant stood behind the altar facing the people anyway. This reading is confirmed by the directives
of the General Instruction, even if they are occasionally at variance with the Ordo Missae. [9] The
third Editio typica of the renewed Missale Romanum, approved by Pope John Paul II on 10 April 2000 and
published in spring 2002, retains these rubrics. [10]
Continue reading....
'Plugged this new edition during my segment this morning on the Son Rise Morning Show. It aired during the 7 am "national hour" on EWTN Radio, which might help boost sales.
Posted by: Rich Leonardi | Monday, August 24, 2009 at 06:25 AM
Thanks, Rich!
Posted by: Carl E. Olson | Monday, August 24, 2009 at 09:31 AM
When I was a young theology student at Steubenville and working on the thesis comparing the liturgy of St. Justin to the liturgy of Pius V and then Vatican II, I thought the direction the priest faced was of little significance. Music, Latin, decorum, etc. held far more weight. Then, a priest friend came to the old convent, which now housed pre-theologate students, and celebrated Mass in the chapel for us. We moved the altar and he celebrated ad orientem. The slight change really emphasized the sacraficial nature of the Mass as well as the fact that the priest was offering the sacrifice on our behalf. It was clear that he was interceding for us. No longer was this an abstract notion that one had to call to mind, but was symbolized by the liturgy itself. I now believe that this is the single most important change that can be made in our celebration of the liturgy.
Posted by: Blake Helgoth | Monday, August 24, 2009 at 10:04 AM