... in the pages of America (August 31, 2009, edition):
It is not about President Obama. He will do some good things as president and other things with which, as Catholics, we will strongly disagree. It is ever so among presidents, and most political leaders.
It is not about Democrats versus Republicans, nor was it a replay of the recent general election.
It is not about whether it is appropriate for the president of the United States to speak at Notre Dame or any great Catholic university on the pressing issues of the day. This is what universities do. No bishop should try to prevent that.
The response, so intense and widespread, is not about what this journal called “sectarian Catholicism.” Rather, the response of the faithful derives directly from the Gospel. In Matthew’s words, “Your light must shine before others, that they may see your good works, and glorify your heavenly Father” (5:13).
Public Witness
Does a Catholic university have the responsibility to give witness to the Catholic faith and to the consequences of that faith by its actions and decisions—especially by a decision to confer its highest honor? If not, what is the meaning of a life of faith? And how can a Catholic institution expect its students to live by faith in the difficult decisions that will confront them in a culture often opposed to the Gospel?
Good follow up on the Notre Dame scandal. So, now what? Will Notre Dame continue to be called a Catholic university, or not? And why?
Posted by: Dan Deeny | Wednesday, August 26, 2009 at 07:26 AM
Too bad Bishop D'Arcy did not take action before all of this happened.
As it is, it's too late. Notre Dame won and they will use this incident as an example going forward, knowing that the opposition is all bark and no bite.
Posted by: Andrew | Wednesday, August 26, 2009 at 09:21 AM