Discovering the Fatherhood of God in a Gender-Neutral Society | Mary
Anastasia
In a popular movie of several years ago, a cherubic six-year-old girl blithely
explains her family drawing to her dumb struck kindergarten companions:
"This is Mark, he's my daytime Daddy; this is Peter, he's my main Daddy;
this is Jack, he's my biological Daddy; this is my Mommy, and this is me."
This situation, while admittedly contrived for the sake of the comedic story
line, still points up a "wrinkle" in modern thinking which sometimes
poses problems for the catechesis of children and adolescents. This "wrinkle,"
or, more properly, this deviation, is the clouding of the concept
of fatherhood. This lack of a human "reference point" can make
it very difficult to teach young people about the loving Fatherhood of God.
This paper will explore the background of the problem, and then look to
the Church's teaching for the response of Faith.
The first point to be examined in this review of the problem is one which
impacts all the other points. This is the assault on "manliness"
in our society today. A very wise man once said, "There is no one so
narrow as an open-minded liberal." This statement is illustrated by
the rabid way in which the "doctrine" known as "political
correctness" is wielded by that small but violently vocal segment of
society, the radical feminists. While claiming to champion "equality"
between males and females, they have really brought about the emasculation
of language and induced a "hunted quarry syndrome" among men today.
Those qualities of maleness which once defined the role of the man in the
fabric of society have been vilified into grounds for prosecution: the strength
which makes him the protector suddenly becomes "animalistic aggression";
the logic and lucidity which give him the ability to provide for his family
suddenly become "paternalistic oppression"; the love which moves
him to desire children is criticized as "patriarchal enslavement."
A generation of men has learned to suppress its instinctive chivalry for
fear of fiery retribution. Masculine forms of language have become the dirtiest
of swear words and masculinity in men (but not in women) a punishable offense.
In short, the essential dignity of being created "male" through
the deliberate act of the Creator has been shredded at the altar of misguided
"equality."
This emasculated mind-set leads to tangible situations in which the concept
of fatherhood is darkened beyond recognition. Webster defines "father"
as both a noun and as a verb. As a noun, "father" is listed as
"a male parent," while in its verb form it means "to act
or serve as a father." In today's society, we very often see the noun
function without the verb function: biological fathering is not followed
by the continuing presence and nurturing of the male parent. The root of
this phenomenon lies in a defective understanding of sexuality, aptly described
by Pope John Paul II in his document, The Gospel of Life:
Continue reading...
Somehow, I don't think it's very manly to accept victimhood at the hands of boogey-feminists. I'm very happy to be a man and a father. I take my role seriously. I don't feel at all threatened by feminists, and certainly not by liberals. In fact, I know many men who, like me, are both liberal and feminist, and we do quite well with the expression of our masculinity and in the responsibility of fatherhood.
While acknowledging that there are always individuals who denigrate fathers because of bad experiences, it's easy enough for a man to set the tone in his own life, to give good example to his kids and his peers, and to simply move on when the occasional embittered person takes a stand. Real men need neither to punch out the bitter, nor let our lives be governed by what others think, say, or broadcast. Happy Father's Day to all, and let it be a blessed one.
Posted by: Todd | Sunday, June 21, 2009 at 05:24 AM
I'm with Todd on this one. A real man doesn't stop being a man because someone might call him a dirty word!
Besides, I suspect our culture of pornography has done more damage to the practice of true fatherhood than have feminist slogans.
Posted by: Howard | Sunday, June 21, 2009 at 11:55 AM
Hectoring tone not recommended to be emulated by any pastoral homilists, IMHO!
Naggy nanny is the domain of the old-fashioned paternalists, usually the Government, no?
Here's a much more sympathetic TOB take on fatherhood, from Anthony Esolen: http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/catholic_stories/cs0384.htm
[ The Unquiet Men - On those who are leaving the reservation ] "You speak to the white man," says the Indian chief, his countenance scarred with age and battle. "You tell them, Big McLintock."
The catechetical work being pleaded for 13 years ago didn't get done, did it? Fathers Cutie, Maciel and Friedl have put the kabosh on that approach, so lets drop the empty moralisms shall we? Satanic Harry Potter and jeremiads against Katrina kept a good man from being installed bishop for a valid and licit reason, the flock weren't impressed that the messenger had their best interests at heart. Appearances can be very deceptive, and a whole generation that grew up with the inanities they did (contraception's ok, women priests are likely, charity is what's deducted from my paycheck as taxes) will need a purer witness to fatherhood from the Church than "do as as I say, no as I do."
http://www.traces-cl.com/2009E/04/theannounce.html
"The problem is that for the method to become an experience of life, we must avoid the temptation to see it as a vision to be “applied.” This will not overcome the devastating and fruitless dualism. Instead, the method becomes life through following another to whom this has happened." Fr. Lorenzo Albacete
(my emphasis)
Posted by: Clare Krishan | Sunday, June 21, 2009 at 11:57 AM