Bookmark and Share
My Photo

FROM the EDITORS:

  • IMPORTANT INFORMATION:
    Opinions expressed on the Insight Scoop weblog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions of Ignatius Press. Links on this weblog to articles do not necessarily imply agreement by the author or by Ignatius Press with the contents of the articles. Links are provided to foster discussion of important issues. Readers should make their own evaluations of the contents of such articles.

NEW & UPCOMING, available from IGNATIUS PRESS







































































« "Catholicism, properly understood ... is one of the sexiest of the world's religions." | Main | What's the difference between Hillary Clinton and Fr. Thomas Reese? »

Thursday, May 07, 2009

Comments

BillyHW

But, but, but, Archbishops Donald Wuerl is a *master* catechist. Don't ever forget that.

Mark Brumley

But of course Dr. Peters is correct here. The Archbishop's statement is so unfounded as to be stunning. The canon was clearly intended to cover a rage of possibilities and that range includes obstinate persistence in manifest grave sin by Catholics who are politicians. Let's put it another way. Is it really the case that we cannot envision any circumstance in which the actions of a Catholic as a politician would put him under canon 915? Support for legislation intended to result in racial genocide, for instance?

BillyHW

Is it really the case that we cannot envision any circumstance in which the actions of a Catholic as a politician would put him under canon 915?

Sure, but he/she would have to be a Republican.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Ignatius Insight

Twitter


Ignatius Press


Catholic World Report


WORTHY OF ATTENTION:




















Blogs & Sites We Like

June 2018

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Blog powered by Typepad