Another excellent piece by Fr. Barron:
What I sensed in both Jenkins’s and Obama’s speeches was a sort of
fetishism of dialogue, an excessive valorization of the second stage of
the cognitional process. The conversation, they seemed to imply, should
remain always open-ended, the dialogue on-going, decision or judgment
permanently delayed. But dialogue is a means to an end; it is valuable
in the measure that it conduces toward judgment. G.K. Chesterton said
that the mind should remain open, but only so that it might, in time,
chomp down on something nourishing. The Church has come to the
considered judgment that abortion is morally objectionable and that Roe
v. Wade is terrible law, as bad as the laws that once protected the
practices of slavery and segregation in our country. To suggest,
therefore, that a Catholic university is a place where dialogue on this
matter is still a desideratum is as ludicrous as suggesting that a
Catholic university should be the setting for a discussion of the
merits of slavery and Jim Crow laws. I would like, actually, to stay
with these last examples. Fr. Theodore Hesburgh, the legendary retired
President of Notre Dame, was mentioned several times in President
Obama’s speech as a model of the dialogue and openness to conversation
that he was extolling. Does anyone think for a moment that Fr.
Hesburgh, at the height of the civil rights movement, would have
invited, say, George Wallace to be the commencement speaker and
recipient of an honorary degree at Notre Dame? Does anyone think that
Fr. Hesburgh would have been open to a dialogue with Wallace about the
merits of his unambiguously racist policies? For that matter, does
anyone think that Dr. Martin Luther King would have sought out common
ground with Wallace or Bull Connor in the hopes of hammering out a
compromise on this pesky question of civil rights for blacks? The
questions answer themselves.
• Dialogue Is Never Enough | Fr. James V. Schall, S.J. (Ignatius Insight)




























































































As an alumnus of a "Jesuit/Catholic" college, I can attest that "dialogue" has become a kind of sacred cow. You are to bow down before this sacred principle at all times. And you have to dialogue with everyone - - except people who support the pope, Church teaching, the Republican party, or who question the value of dialogue on intrinsic evils like abortion. There also can be no dialogue about the importance of dialogue.
Posted by: Jack | Monday, May 25, 2009 at 05:52 AM