The "single most common objection to the Faith today"

This from Peter Kreeft's address, "A Philosophical Refutation of Reductionism," which was presented to the Hawaii International Conference on Arts and Humanities last year:

Ronald Knox once quipped that "the study of comparative religions is the best way to become comparatively religious." The reason, as G. K. Chesterton says, is that, according to most "scholars" of comparative religion, "Christianity and Buddhism are very much alike, especially Buddhism."

But any Christian who does apologetics must think about comparative religions because the most popular of all objections against the claims of Christianity today comes from this field. The objection is not that Christianity is not true but that it is not the truth; not that it is a false religion but that it is only a religion. The world is a big place, the objector reasons; "different strokes for different folks". How insufferably narrow-minded to claim that Christianity is the one true religion! God just has to be more open-minded than that.

This is the single most common objection to the Faith today, for "today" worships not God but equality. It fears being right where others are wrong more than it fears being wrong. It worships democracy and resents the fact that God is an absolute monarch. It has changed the meaning of the word honor from being respected because you are superior in some way to being accepted because you are not superior in any way but just like us. The one unanswerable insult, the absolutely worst name you can possibly call a person in today's society, is "fanatic", especially "religious fanatic". If you confess at a fashionable cocktail party that you are plotting to overthrow the government, or that you are a PLO terrorist or a KGB spy, or that you molest porcupines or bite bats' heads off, you will soon attract a buzzing, fascinated, sympathetic circle of listeners. But if you confess that you believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God, you will find yourself suddenly alone, with a distinct chill in the air.

Here are twelve of the commonest forms of this objection, the odium of elitism, with answers to each.

Read the entire essay over at the Catholic Education Resource Center site.

Visit the Ignatius Insight author page for Peter Kreeft:

Comments

[Manuel G. Daugherty Razetto]

Thanks Carl for introducing Peter Kreeft's essay. What sheer delight to read his thoughts. I only knew little about his books and will certainly take up on his work.
Comparative Religion studies widen our scope intellectually as well spiritually.
I didn't agree with his thoughts that 'eastern religions' ought to be considered , mostly, as philosophies; i.e.: there is a huge difference between Hinayana and Mahayana Budhism: one is more for the masses and is tremendously religious while the other one is highly orthodox and philosophical.

[Unwashed]

I'm surprised that Peter Kreeft needs only eight pages to prove that a (the) supernatural realm exists! His bottom line 'proof' on the last page asserts that "...since any act of knowing transcends its object, the act of knowing the universe transcends the universe."

As a material reductionist, it's obvious to me that acts of "knowing" are simply specific bio-chemical configurations of my brain that, dead or alive, is very much a part of the universe

As Sagan often observed, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." Antiquated scholastic logic games might be helpful for sudoku, but little else.