What Is the Magisterium? | Thomas Storck
. . . Further, all those things are to be believed with
divine and Catholic faith which are contained in the Word of God, written or
handed down, and which the Church, either by a solemn judgment or by her
ordinary and universal teaching [magisterium], proposes for belief as having been divinely revealed. [1]
The crisis that has afflicted the Catholic Church since
the middle of the 1960s has been a crisis of both faith and morals, that is, a
crisis that has made many Catholics no longer know what to believe or what kind
of conduct God expects of us. What is needed as a remedy for this is a firm
standard, a reliable guide or teacher who can tell us both what we must believe
and what we must do. And, of course, in Christ's true Church we do have such a
reliable standard and guide. But even Catholics of good will can sometimes be
confused about exactly which voices within the Church they are to follow.
In the past the average Catholic could depend on the word
of his parish priest if he had any doubts about correct Catholic belief or
conduct, or even on the example of the many good Catholics about him. But today
one can no longer trust everything that is said by just any priest or
theologian, and our fellow parishioners are likely to be totally confused about
what the Church proclaims to have been revealed by God. And so it behooves us
to understand a word and concept that is apt to be unfamiliar or confusing.
This word is Magisterium. Now the Latin
word magisterium originally meant
the duty or office of a teacher, tutor, master, etc. And in the case of the
Church it means simply the teaching authority or office of the Church. The Magisterium is the teaching office of the Church, accomplished
by the Holy Father and the bishops teaching in union with him.
The rule of what we must believe as Catholics was defined
by the First Vatican Council (1870) thus:
This quotation brings up several points that must be
explained. In the first place, the decree speaks of the "Word of God, written
or handed down," that is, recorded either in Sacred Scripture or in Sacred
Tradition. Now at first it might seem as if Sacred Scripture and Sacred
Tradition are two separate sources of divine revelation. But the Second Vatican
Council explained that in fact, "Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture make up
a single sacred deposit of the Word of God, which is entrusted to the Church."
[2] In other words, the truths which God has revealed to his Church come to us
through two modes, but they constitute
one body of truth, the Word of God. Therefore the Protestant practice of
equating the Word of God with only
the written Bible is an error. Moreover, as should be obvious from a little
reflection and historical knowledge, Sacred Scripture is itself a product of
the Church's thought and activity, and in this sense a product of Sacred
Tradition. This is true even though Scripture has God for its author and is
itself a mode of revelation, for the human authors of the New Testament wrote
from within the Church and took for granted the Church's teaching and worship
as they wrote.
Read the entire article...
Does anyone know what Mr. Storck's day job is? I've read him, off and on, for years now, and I've never known what he does for living, or where.
Posted by: Ed Peters | Sunday, October 19, 2008 at 04:26 PM
Some of the min-bios attached to his various (and many) articles state that he is (or was) a librarian in the Washington, D.C., area. He is certainly an excellent thinker and writer.
Posted by: Carl E. Olson | Sunday, October 19, 2008 at 04:45 PM
That's as close as I ever got, too, Carl; is, or was, a librarian on the East Coast. I think.
Posted by: Ed Peters | Sunday, October 19, 2008 at 06:12 PM