There has been a bit of controversy recently about some remarks that Fr. Fessio made about Benedict XVI, the Koran, and Islam in an interview he had with Hugh Hewitt on January 5th. Soon afterward, some of Fr. Fessio's remarks were called into question (see Christopher Blosser's post at "Against the Grain" for more details. Also see this piece by Sandro Magister), especially the remark:
Well, the thesis that was proposed by this scholar was that Islam can enter into the modern world if the Koran is reinterpreted by taking the specific legislation, and going back to the principles, and then adapting it to our times, especially with the dignity that we ascribe to women, which has come through Christianity, of course. And immediately, the Holy Father, in his beautiful calm but clear way, said well, there's a fundamental problem with that, because he said in the Islamic tradition, God has given His word to Mohammed, but it's an eternal word. It's not Mohammed's word. It's there for eternity the way it is. There's no possibility of adapting it or interpreting it....
In a January 21st letter to the editor of The Washington Times, Fr. Fessio addressed the controvery and made some clarifications:
Dear Editor,
I think it is important for me to give context to and clarify the remarks I made recently in a radio interview with Hugh Hewitt, reported in the January 20th Washington Times.
The most important clarification is that the Holy Father did not say, nor did I, that “Islam is incapable of reform”.
What I did say--and it contains an unfortunate ambiguity--is that “in the Islamic tradition, God has given His word to Mohammed, but it's an eternal word. It's not Mohammed's word. It's there for eternity the way it is. There's no possibility of adapting it or interpreting it, whereas in Christianity, and Judaism, the dynamism's completely different, that God has worked through His creatures.”
Note first that it was the Koran that was referred to, not Islam. The comparison was between the Christian Bible and the Koran, not between Christianity and Islam. I said, paraphrasing the Holy Father that “there’s an inner logic to the Christian Bible, which permits it and requires it to be adapted to new situations”. Then I maladroitly alluded to this comparison referring to “that distinction when the Koran, which is seen as something dropped out of Heaven, which cannot be adapted or applied, even, and the Bible, which is a word of God that comes through a human community.”
I made a serious error in precision when I said that the Koran “cannot be adapted or applied” and that there is “no possibility of adapting or interpreting it”. This is certainly not what the Holy Father said. Of course the Koran can be and has been interpreted and applied. I was making a (too) crude summary of the distinction which the Holy Father did make between the inner dynamism of the Koran as a divine text delivered as such to Mohammed, and that of the Bible which is both the Word of God and the words of men inspired by God, within a community that contains divinely appointed authorized interpreters (the bishops in communion with the pope).
The meeting was an informal one of the Holy Father and his former students. The presentation and the discussion were in German, and the Holy Father was not speaking from a prepared text. My German is passable, but not entirely reliable. My later remarks in a live radio interview were extemporaneous. I think that I paraphrased the Holy Father with general accuracy, but my mentioning what he said at all was an indiscretion, and my impromptu paraphrase in another language should not be used for a careful exegesis of the mind of the Holy Father.
Fr. Joseph Fessio, S.J.
Provost, Ave Maria University
Editor, Ignatius Press
The thing is, the more appropriate simile is that the Qur'an is to Islam what Christ is to the Church, not the Bible. In Islam, the Qur'an is the Word in the sense that we have in the Church that the Son is the Word. Muslims view the Qur'an as being, first of all, uncreated, eternal, and not really existing apart from God (Allah), but proceeding from Him. The more precise analog to the Qur'an is Christ, not the Bible. This is one of the difficulties that (well-meaning, but nevertheless naive) outsiders have in trying to understand why there is such a literalist bent prevalent in the Islamic religious world. It is because the Qur'an is not seen as Muhammad's writing inspired by Allah. No, the Qur'an is the uncreated, breath-for-breath, letter-for-letter, eternal revelation emanating from Allah from eternity, pre-existent and consented to by all the prophets even before Muhammad was born. To adopt anything other than a literalist interpretation of the Qur'an would be to lessen its divinity. Remember also, that apostasy and heresy in Islam are punishable by death. There is no clerical hierarchy (the Shi`a do have clerical ranks but it is a far cry from episcopacy; Sunnis take a somewhat Erastian view of authority). Interpretation is largely a matter of what the consensus of Muslims agrees upon (in the Sunni model; the Shi`a look to a succession of 12 infallible Imams). There is not going to be much new interpretation nowadays because anything that was authentically handed down from Muhammad and the earliest Muslims (who are the only people given any kind of authority to interpret the Qur'an) was codified about a thousand years ago. Besides which, one of the most heinous of sins that Muhammad constantly warned against was "bida`" ("innovation"). This is what the Jews and Christians that came before him were accused of, and Muslims jealously guard their religion from any kind of novel interpretation that was not approved by the first few generations who lived with Muhammad (or the Imams). When Muslims describe their faith as the "religion of peace," outsiders seem to get a warm, fuzzy feeling because they are imagining something other than what is really meant by this. The Islamic idea of peace is that peace comes only through submission to Allah and his apostle (Muhammad). If you oppose Allah or oppose Muhammad, you will not have peace, and you will be at fault for rejecting them. Heresy and apostasy are not tolerated. We shouldn't be so condescending and belittle our Muslim neighbors' sincerely held beliefs by saying that they can reinterpret their text to fit modern times. This would be akin to asking a Catholic to reinterpret Jesus' deity, humanity, and relationship within the Trinity to fit some secular agenda, and then on top of that, to suggest that we should ignore the teaching of the Apostles and earliest Fathers of the Church, as well as the Popes, and interpret the Bible freely. Looking at the Qur'an as a "text" and not as something uncreated, eternal, and pre-existent, proceeding from and essentially inseparable from God is not only an inaccurate assessment, but most Muslims would find it highly insulting. And then to suggest that a novel 21st century (or 15th century in the Islamic calendar) interpretation is better than those codified by those who heard and wrote down the explanations of Muhammad and his early successors and associates is doubly insulting.
Posted by: Thomas Crescenzi | Monday, January 23, 2006 at 06:51 PM
Most helpful. Many thanks.
Posted by: Jackson | Monday, January 23, 2006 at 10:38 PM
This is a topic that bears considerable discussion. There are lots of key elements to the conversation. Certainly, the Qur'an's position in Islam being analogous to the Logos' position in Christianity is one of them.
The fact that the Qur'an is generally regarded by Muslim scholars as the unmediated Word of God makes it difficult to envision how the Qur'an could be applied in anything less than an absolute way by faithful Muslims. While there are certain "liberalizing" tendencies among a minority of Muslims, it would be surprising if such tendencies came to effect the majority of Muslims.
Surprising, but not impossible. It may well be logically inconsistent for a Muslim to affirm the traditional Islamic view of the Qur'an and at the same time apply Islamic teachings in ways more compatible with the full dignity of the human person, as the Western Judeo-Christian tradition understands it. But people sometimes come to espouse positions ultimately inconsistent with other positions they hold or they allow one position to reshape other positions, even more ostensibly foundational ideas, they affirm.
Will that happen with the majority of Muslims? Will they eventually be compelled to revise or modify their view of the Qur'an?
Who knows? What we can say right now is that no such massive "development of doctrine" is on the horizon. Why should it be, when the very notion of doctrinal development and its legitimacy are at issue?
Posted by: Mark Brumley | Tuesday, January 24, 2006 at 07:16 AM
Not only does the Koran warn against innovation,
it also repeatedly warns against identifying
anything earthly with Allah.
This, in particular,
seems to be iconoclastic and specifically Anti-Christ
(Though the Koran freely accepts Jesus as Messiah
it seems that the authoruty of this title is meaningless)
On the other hand, the Koran (as is mentioned above) is
strictly identified with Allah.
Posted by: Patrick Coulton | Tuesday, January 24, 2006 at 07:50 AM
There is a profound problem with all the dialogue we hear concerning our Church leaders and other religions. It is this:
I teach seventh grade CCD. For homework they are required to attend Mass on Sunday. Hardly any do. My choice is to tell them it is a mortal sin to miss Mass or to ignore the Church's teaching. I think the argument would be if they don't know or worse yet don't believe it is a mortal sin then it isn't. Therefore, is their chance of getting to heaven better if I don't tell them?
Is this not what is going on with our so called dialogue with other faiths? Can we look for common ground with our "elder brothers", the Jews. Should we tell the Muslims they can't get to heaven unless they are baptized, or should we let it slide.
Should I teach my seventh grade CCD it is a mortal sin to miss Mass on Sunday when our Church fathers will not stand up to the Islamic and Jewish faiths who deny the very diviniity of Christ?
Posted by: Don Moga | Wednesday, February 01, 2006 at 04:56 AM
monadelphia kulak morricer nonplate polychromic reckoning pseudoceratitic scrapple
crateman
http://www.angelfire.com/ybppri/4.html
spoffle
http://www.angelfire.com/pgvlfs/7.html
angulous
http://www.angelfire.com/ybppri/10.html
newcal
http://www.angelfire.com/pgvlfs/3.html
vestrify
http://www.angelfire.com/pgvlfs/10.html
ereption
http://www.freewebs.com/eftvge/9.html
truthful
http://www.angelfire.com/ybppri/6.html
skidpan
http://www.freewebs.com/nzwvur/3.html
adder
http://www.angelfire.com/pgvlfs/8.html
ismal
http://www.angelfire.com/ybppri/7.html
Posted by: Norbert Thompson | Tuesday, October 02, 2007 at 11:25 AM
monadelphia kulak morricer nonplate polychromic reckoning pseudoceratitic scrapple
58556
http://www.angelfire.com/dfghbx/12.html
16046
http://www.freewebs.com/pkezuq/2.html
99308
http://www.angelfire.com/dfghbx/3.html
24086
http://www.freewebs.com/jxseec/12.html
26275
http://www.freewebs.com/jxseec/4.html
Posted by: Hugh Villarreal | Friday, October 05, 2007 at 05:00 PM
monadelphia kulak morricer nonplate polychromic reckoning pseudoceratitic scrapple
61140
http://www.angelfire.com/zwhfjm/10.html
63406
http://www.angelfire.com/xfkeja/3.html
62619
http://www.freewebs.com/iyevmp/8.html
92946
http://www.angelfire.com/zwhfjm/4.html
12003
http://www.angelfire.com/xfkeja/8.html
Posted by: Alisa Lott | Saturday, October 06, 2007 at 05:05 AM
monadelphia kulak morricer nonplate polychromic reckoning pseudoceratitic scrapple
Adrenal Adenoma
http://uwjrhind.info/501.html
Posted by: Len Cross | Wednesday, October 10, 2007 at 05:46 AM
monadelphia kulak morricer nonplate polychromic reckoning pseudoceratitic scrapple
143
http://avvrxoei.info/93.html
Posted by: Kendra Serrano | Saturday, October 13, 2007 at 08:06 AM
monadelphia kulak morricer nonplate polychromic reckoning pseudoceratitic scrapple
Project Management Training Chicago
http://tohtxdsz.info/179.html
Posted by: Shawna Oneill | Monday, October 15, 2007 at 06:53 PM
cosamin buy online
[url=http://cosamin-ds.idoo.com/capsule-cosamin-ds.html]cosamin good for health[/url]
best site
Posted by: cosamin-onhfghhjs | Wednesday, October 24, 2007 at 07:17 AM
monadelphia kulak morricer nonplate polychromic reckoning pseudoceratitic scrapple
Ocean City Mfg Co Fishing Reel
http://www.angelfire.com/qmgocqfq/198.html
Tv Show Alias
http://www.angelfire.com/kmcgpuqz/5lo.html
Dune Buggy Kits
http://www.angelfire.com/dgpwdkah/p9.html
Female Hair Loss Treatment
http://www.angelfire.com/nladisqg/30d.html
Llama Song Download
http://www.angelfire.com/pgvkeadi/35y.html
Branson Missouri Vacations
http://www.angelfire.com/wezxmxds/2nz.html
John L Scott Seattle
http://www.angelfire.com/acjsldbp/45j.html
Leather Seat Repair
http://www.angelfire.com/dkjlsbcr/2f8.html
Historic Homes Chico California
http://www.angelfire.com/kjcmuuko/2ct.html
Little White Wedding Chapel
http://www.angelfire.com/fsedexdr/2yo.html
How To Write A Descriptive Essay
http://www.angelfire.com/hrfrptpb/5tm.html
Hp Laserjet 4050
http://www.angelfire.com/nkivqzhh/492.html
Traditional German Recipes
http://www.angelfire.com/jpubdztl/jr.html
1959 Ford Skyliner For Private Sale
http://www.angelfire.com/prqzodrj/gb.html
Glass In A Swimming Pool
http://www.angelfire.com/xsaqutjx/3s.html
Real Estate In Pebble Beach
http://www.angelfire.com/oslssqio/2cs.html
Ford Engine Firing Order
http://www.angelfire.com/nazunnez/32t.html
Men Transformed Into Beautiful Women
http://www.angelfire.com/ngdbkhrp/v4.html
Home Pain Remedy Tooth
http://www.angelfire.com/nkivqzhh/vl.html
Microsoft Word 2003 Crack
http://www.angelfire.com/ejwrdhdg/15z.html
Radio Shack Coupons
http://www.angelfire.com/nnnomdsi/5cr.html
Social Systems Theory
http://www.angelfire.com/kjcmuuko/fm.html
Texas Retirement Communities
http://www.angelfire.com/afkeerbm/uu.html
North Eugene High School
http://www.angelfire.com/wowfqelb/4wc.html
Discount Air Travel Ticket
http://www.angelfire.com/nladisqg/1gy.html
Track Airline Flight Progress
http://www.angelfire.com/xsaqutjx/348.html
Address Search
http://www.angelfire.com/jyvqvirm/66.html
Volusia County Florida Lot Cutting
http://www.angelfire.com/nazunnez/5bu.html
Wake County
http://www.angelfire.com/oslssqio/5eb.html
When Is Hurricane Season In Florida
http://www.angelfire.com/nladisqg/3rx.html
Posted by: Cameron Lancaster | Thursday, November 01, 2007 at 02:09 PM
eliminate blackshirted paradoxal chaperonage sycophantical caliperer continuant toadpipe
4 Stroke Outboard Motors
http://19-n1.mxjxqf.com/
Stories Of People Dying From Lupus
http://t-3j.mxjxqf.com/
Posted by: Daryl Mercado | Tuesday, December 18, 2007 at 02:23 PM
What a cute site you have here.
I can tell that you have put a lot of time and work into it.
Great job!
adipex free shipping
http://adipexadipexonl.blog.ijijiji.com
Posted by: buy adipex | Sunday, February 03, 2008 at 01:07 PM
CICeac sd9fj41dkg0ckahr82y4
Posted by: larry | Friday, May 09, 2008 at 08:11 PM