Following up on the rumor of Archbishop Levada's alleged impending appointment to head the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, here is a story from Newsday with a slightly different take: http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/world/wire/sns-ap-vatican-doctrinal-chief,0,4395943.story?coll=sns-ap-world-headlines .
The Newsday piece quotes a Vatican source to the effect that the Pope hasn't made up his mind and that he is talking to many people about the post of Prefect of CDF. All the major heads of Vatican offices are supposedly being sounded out for the CDF post. Obviously, as one of the Archbishop consultants to CDF, Archbishop Levada might well be included in the group.
What are we to make of that? I'll say it again: we'll see.
This whole business has been strange. First, we had the rumor of Cardinal George going to CDF. Then a week ago or so, the Archbishop of Portland passes on a rumor to the press that Archbishop Levada is being considered. This is not some unnamed diocesan source, mind you, but the Archbishop of Portland on the record.
Since then, the media has followed the rumor. Now we get a Vatican official saying that Archbishop Levada is a shoe-in, unless someone gets to the Pope and gets him to change his mind. Is that a hope or a fear of the official? We can't tell. Is it a signal to complain or to lend support? We can't tell.
Whatever it is, it isn't the kind of thing we would expect to read about, anymore than we would expect the Archbishop of Portland to be passing along rumors to the press. Perhaps this is simply an odd configuration of stories about rumors, but that seems unlikely.
By the way, one of the Roman sources purporting that Archbishop Levada is the Pope's pick as CDF head also reports that Father Joseph Fessio, S.J., is being considered as Archbishop of San Francisco. Make of that what you will.
The Archbishop of Portland usually avoids controversy or attention at all costs. Wonder what's up with that...
Posted by: Carl Olson | Wednesday, May 11, 2005 at 04:00 PM
Denver is currently looking for an auxiliary bishop since we lost Bishop Gomez. I hope that Fr. Fessio will be appointed to Denver instead of S.F.
Posted by: pazdziernik | Wednesday, May 11, 2005 at 06:15 PM
I'm a bit confused here since I know very little about Archbishop Levada. Do the bloggers here consider him to be a good choice for the head of the CDF, or a not-so-good choice? Or maybe somewhere in between?
Posted by: Paul H | Wednesday, May 11, 2005 at 08:30 PM
This is a non-issue to me. Could it have possibly been made more clear, between the death of John Paul II and the selection of Benedict XVI, that God is at work in the Catholic Church?
Posted by: grateful_catholic | Wednesday, May 11, 2005 at 08:41 PM
This is getting funny. Levada yes. Levada no. Levada we are not sure.
Then with Fr. Fessio Archbishop of San Francisco. Now that would be the epitome of irony. Not a happy one for USF, I would guess. Not a happy one for the superiors who all but exiled him from the SF area. I think he would be great as an archbishop, in San Francisco or wherever. However, he was very clear about two or three weeks ago about Jesuits not accepting that ordination or "job promotion." It is said he said this in relation to explaining why those Jesuits connected with being students of Pope Benedict XVI and helping with founding of Communio are not of the bishopric rank, though the other priests have been raised to this level.
www.eagleandelephant.blogspot.com
Posted by: W. | Wednesday, May 11, 2005 at 10:47 PM
Just for the record, in case anyone asks, I've not yet received a call from Rome. But I'm waiting patiently...
Posted by: Carl Olson | Thursday, May 12, 2005 at 12:08 AM
Well, Carl, actually Rome called here first to ask about you. I said you were busy.
Posted by: Mark Brumley | Thursday, May 12, 2005 at 08:00 AM
Busy!? I only work 30 to 40 minutes a day! C'mon!
Posted by: Carl Olson | Thursday, May 12, 2005 at 08:37 AM
Yeah, but at least 20 of the 30-45 minutes a day you work, you work for Igatius Insight. I've gotta protect our readers from Rome taking you away.
Posted by: Mark Brumley | Thursday, May 12, 2005 at 09:01 AM
Boys, take this inside. C'mon now.
Posted by: Ed Peters | Thursday, May 12, 2005 at 09:12 AM
Joseph Cardinal Bernardin originally recommended Archbishop Levada. Levada was on the CDF before Ratzinger was. I have friends who have big misunderstandings of the Catholic faith and in my friendship and correspondence with them, I tend to try to clear up misunderstandings. My good relationship with them is exactly the reason I'd never recommend them as an author or speaker on things dogmatic. Pope Benedict does know Levada very well, which is why I believe Levada has no chance to be appointed as CDF.
Father Fessio as Bishop of SF would be awesome! One can dream, right? ahhh. Ok, now back to reality. I don't think the source is credible.
Posted by: Steve Ambuul | Friday, May 13, 2005 at 11:43 AM
I agree. No chance. None whatsoever. It's utterly impossible.
Wait a minute. Wait a minute... something is coming through now over the news wire: "Archbishop William Levada of San Francisco has just been named Prefect of the ..."
As I was saying, Archbishop Levada will certainly be appointed Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Who could possibly think otherwise?
Any questions?
Posted by: Mark Brumley | Friday, May 13, 2005 at 02:17 PM
Fr. Fessio back to SF as bishop is more a dream come true for his many students who lived through the mid-to-late '80s with him and SII, and want to see the likes of Fr. Cartwright and the Sugar Plum Fairy run screaming from Xavier. Better that he's building a strong, intellectual center, even if it is in Florida swampland.
Posted by: alan funky | Friday, May 13, 2005 at 02:55 PM
WOW! How can I delete my old comments?
Wait, maybe I should be organizing an enormous party to welcome Bishop Fessio to San Francisco!
Posted by: Steve Ambuul | Friday, May 13, 2005 at 03:15 PM
I pray the Holy Father has Fr. Fessio in mind as the replacement for Archbishop Levada -- and that he reminds him of the Jesuit's fourth vow.
Posted by: Aida Cordano | Sunday, May 15, 2005 at 06:23 AM
I pray the Holy Father has Fr. Fessio in mind as the replacement for Archbishop Levada -- and that he reminds him of the Jesuit's fourth vow.
Posted by: Aida Cordano | Sunday, May 15, 2005 at 06:24 AM
San Francisco is in dire need of social and ecclesial orthodoxy! The faithful ought to fervently pray for an Archbishop who will brave not only the winds of error and the storm of confusion but who will be an obedient and loving server and co-worker of the Truth! History tells us that Father Joseph Fessio is prepared for this role. He described himself once as being "thick-skinned". He forgot to add that inside the thick skin bears the Heart of Christ.
Servant of God John Paul II, we ask for your intercession that if it be accordance with the will of God, Father Joseph Fessio S.J. be the next Archbishop of San Francisco.
http://stpetershelpers.blogspot.com/
Posted by: St. Peter's helper | Sunday, May 15, 2005 at 02:58 PM
There's something providential in all of this. Instead of explaining it again, check out "What's in a name" in my blogsite. Just click the hyperlink "St Peter's helper" below.
Posted by: St. Peter's helper | Sunday, May 15, 2005 at 08:05 PM
Notice that the rumor of Fr. Fessio to Frisco is far more popular than the rumor of Archbishop Levada to CDF. I wonder if Fr. Fessio as Archbishop would formally excommunicate all the nominally Catholic politicians in his diocese who have been beating the drum for homosexual marriage and abortion on demand?
Posted by: John | Monday, May 16, 2005 at 10:36 AM
How about the next Archbishop of San Francisco excommunicating all the nominally Catholic Bishops and Priests in his diocese???
Posted by: Teresa | Monday, May 16, 2005 at 06:30 PM