The February 2005 issue of First Things contains R. R. Reno's account—"Out of the Ruins" (not yet online, but perhaps will be soon)—of leaving the Episcopal Church for the Catholic Church. Reno teaches theology at Creighton University (a Jesuit school) and is the author of In the Ruins of the Church. Apparently he tired of the ruins: "Now I am a member of the Catholic Church. I changed—I made a change. I do not think I changed my mind about theology or ecclesiology or the fate of Christianity in the modern world. I suppose that, in the end, I changed my mind about myself."
In related news, the National Catholic Register has a piece about former Episcopal priest Eric Bergman, who recently entered the Catholic Church, along with his wife and three children. And they aren't alone:
Bergman also brings with him some 60 parishioners from his former congregation, the Church of the Good Shepherd in Scranton, Pa., where he served as rector for five years, and 10 Episcopalians from a nearby parish.
There are more to follow, I'm certain. Perhaps many more. It is not, of course, cause for crowing or cheerleading, but for thanksgiving and praise. May God grant others the grace and strength needed for the journey.
There is an excerpt from Prof. Russell Reno's article on Al Kimmel's "Pontifications" blog, with Al Kimmel's thanks to Richard Neuhaus for permission to print it:
http://pontifications.classicalanglican.net/index.php?p=657#comments
Posted by: Teresa Polk | Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 07:36 PM
Welcome, and amen!
Posted by: Faith | Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 05:41 AM
Would someone please explain to me what "crossing the Tiber" is supposed to mean? It has absolutely no foundation in theological, historical, or literary circles. "Crossing the Rubicon", yes, that meant something, and everybody back then knew what it meant; same for "crossing the Delaware". Both crossing actions literally conveyed a major choice, because circumstances on one side of the river were clearly different than circumstnaces on the other. But there's NOTHING significantly different about one side of the Tiber as compared to the other. I know, I know, Steve Ray used the phrase as a catchy title for his engrossing conversion story, but now it seems everybody and his brother uses it as a euphemism for "conversion". But I can't possibly mean that, because, as I said, there ain't no difference from one side of the Tiber to the other. Rome (literally and figuratively) lies on both sides of the Tiber! Could we please let this expression just sort of go away? If not, I may be forced into crossing the Huron, and you all know what THAT would mean.
Posted by: Ed Peters | Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 11:58 PM
This Episcopalian exodus to the Catholic Church is very real. Myself, my Mother and two Brothers have made the move. I have had the pleasure of participating in two RCIA programs at a huge Catholic Church, St. Thomas More in Englewood, CO. The Parish has roughly 6500 families. They convert roughly 40 adults & 40 children every Easter and about 10% of every group is ex-Episcopalian. My experience leads my to believe that the only stumbling block is the Pope. (Believe it or not Marian worship isn't a problem) If you can get the potential convert to understand the theological and biblical purpose of the Pope then the battle is won.
Posted by: Russ Clark | Monday, February 21, 2005 at 10:57 AM
Careful, Russ, no one worships Mary in the Catholic Church! Revering and worshipping are two different things, as are prayer and worship. Yes, we pray to Our Lady and the saints, but that is not the same as adoration and worship. Think of it more like a conversation with a friend when you ask him or her to pray for you.
Posted by: Christine | Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 08:04 AM
For poster Faith, Rome may be on both sides of the Tiber but I believe the Vatican (Catholic Church)is alone on one side, therefore you need to "Cross the Tiber" to come in to the catholic Faith
Posted by: Walda Gagnon | Monday, April 11, 2005 at 09:09 PM
Faith...Crossing the Tiber may also be understood as the one performing the Sign of the Cross, as done in the Catholic Church.
Posted by: Charles Dennis | Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 04:08 PM