... I'll think about wearing it. That's because Typealyzer analyzed this blog and made the following judgment:
The analysis indicates that the author of http://insightscoop.typepad.com/ is of the type:
INTP - The Thinkers
The logical and analytical type. They are espescially [sic] attuned to difficult creative and intellectual challenges and always look for something more complex to dig into. They are great at finding subtle connections between things and imagine far-reaching implications.
They enjoy working with complex things using a lot of concepts and imaginative models of reality. Since they are not very good at seeing and understanding the needs of other people, they might come across as arrogant, impatient and insensitive to people that need some time to understand what they are talking about.
INTP - The Thinkers
The logical and analytical type. They are espescially [sic] attuned to difficult creative and intellectual challenges and always look for something more complex to dig into. They are great at finding subtle connections between things and imagine far-reaching implications.
They enjoy working with complex things using a lot of concepts and imaginative models of reality. Since they are not very good at seeing and understanding the needs of other people, they might come across as arrogant, impatient and insensitive to people that need some time to understand what they are talking about.
Of course, I'm far too humble, patient, caring, and downright lovable to actually be some of those negative things. But, I will say that anyone who misspells "especially" really shouldn't be out here in cyberspace. We do have standards, don't you know, in this brave, daring, and daunting world of blogdom.
"...imagine far-reaching implications..."
"...imaginative models of reality..."
Is that an arrogant put-down or is it a back handed way of calling you creative?
Posted by: LJ | Tuesday, December 09, 2008 at 04:18 AM
The analysis was written by someone whose understanding of the English syntax is a little bit off it seems in some ways. Not that there's anything with that.
Posted by: Ed Peters | Tuesday, December 09, 2008 at 11:07 AM
LJ and Ed: I really think it's a very legitimate, scientific analysis of our blog. I have complete faith in it. ;-)
Posted by: Carl Olson | Tuesday, December 09, 2008 at 11:30 AM
"Since they are not very good at seeing and understanding the needs of other people..."
LOL! That's actually kind of true. I've seen Carl, et al lay into some of the poseurs that appear from time-to-time in order to refute their posts by appealing to feelings, both explicitly and implicitly. While it's painful to read (charity Carl, please!), it's probably also quite necessary.
Actually, the description in general is not that bad. A bit clumsy and too short, but for an mechanistic evaluation, not bad.
Posted by: Telemachus | Tuesday, December 09, 2008 at 03:23 PM