Our Brave New World will be designed by techies and celebs
Or, as this Brietbart.com piece puts it, by the "technology industry and Hollywood elite." Come to think of it, we're already there. But it seems that some want us to be there even more than we are:
The Charter for Compassion project on the Internet at www.charterforcompassion.org springs from a "wish" granted this year to religious scholar Karen Armstrong at a premier Technology, Entertainment and Design (TED) conference in California.
"Tedizens" include Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin along with other Internet icons as well as celebrities such as Forest Whittaker and Cameron Diaz.
Wishes granted at TED envision ways to better the world and come with a promise that Tedizens will lend their clout and capabilities to making them come true.
Armstrong's wish is to combine universal principles of respect and compassion into a charter based on a "golden rule" she believes is at the core of every major religion.
Armstrong's claim to fame is that she is an ex-Catholic nun who is now an "expert" in comparative religion, apparently because she has a degree in...modern literature? How very...post-modern. Anyhow, her "take it home and try it on for size" quote is: "I say that religion isn’t about believing things. It’s ethical
alchemy. It’s about behaving in a way that changes you, that gives you
intimations of holiness and sacredness.” Strangely enough, such pseudo-intellectual utterances are meaningless unless people believe they are true and then act accordingly. Or at least I think that is the case. Unfortunately, not being an internet icon nor a movie star leaves me ill equipped to think, make wishes, lend my clout, or buy really fast sports cars.
In related news:
Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to go watch a movie on my iPod...




































































































Mustapha Mond has just been elected president. We might as well go all the way.
Posted by: Jackson | Friday, November 21, 2008 at 08:32 AM
I always have thought "Brave New World" was the sci-fi dystopian novel that had the greatest chance of being the real future. "1984" would require a centralized government so big that it would implode. "Fahrenheit 451" would create a world so completely ignorant that it couldn't keep the lights on more than a generation. But BNW, with its emphasis on sex, drugs and playtime for grownups, always seemed to me the one most likely to succeed. Not seeing a whole lot to make me think otherwise, these days.
Posted by: MarkAA | Friday, November 21, 2008 at 02:20 PM
MarkAA,
Leon Kass agrees with you:
http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=2576
Having burned my bridges to the public school system, I had to apply to go to Saint Raphael Academy for high school. The Christian Brothers required us to read several books that, for various reasons, were banned in the public school system. "Brave New World" was one of them.
Posted by: Charles E Flynn | Friday, November 21, 2008 at 04:08 PM
The "new world order", the "global ethic", the "new man" united by means of a religious syncretism or secular ethic is simply the modern world's attempt to build the Tower of Babel. Look! It's our accomplishment! We will reach the heavens with our ingenuity and cooperation! It's bound to fail, just like it did in Genesis 11. The only way to unite humanity in the proper universal order is to submit to God's plan, decreed from the beginning of time, to unite all things in heaven and on earth in Christ (Ephesians 1).
Posted by: Sawyer | Friday, November 21, 2008 at 06:33 PM
All entertainment, all the time; all sex, all the time; sexualized children; plugged-in 24/7; silence almost intolerable; indifference to the highest things; mass shamelessness; modesty dismissed as prudery; humans as technological objects, described as 'wired' etc.; everybody drugged; a bovine self-branded populace (tattoos) of counterfeit individuals; sanitized thought & speech; roses with no scent; unhappiness pathologized as 'depression'; 'rights' without duties; religion castrated as mere 'spirituality'; broken families called 'dysfunctional,' not sinful; countless solitaries everywhere; deviancy normalized & normality seen as strange; chronological snobbery at every turn; the myth of progress almost universally embraced; man as perfectible & sufficient unto himself; the ultimate in consumerism: human life itself consumerized at the sacrificial altar of 'choice' and convenience; Mustapha Mond elected President....
Yep, it's all there in Brave New World.
Posted by: Jackson | Friday, November 21, 2008 at 09:11 PM
No doubt, Sawyer. In fact today I made a new page related to this:
http://tinyurl.com/6q8yms
Posted by: Jackson | Friday, November 21, 2008 at 09:15 PM
If I am not mistaken, Pope Benedict XVI laid out the necessary groundwork for dialogue between religions; reason. Without it there can only be conflict.
The big elephant in the room that these well-meaning Hollywood elites are worried about, but refuse to recognize, is radical Islam. They cannot imagine, if they are just nice to them, how the radical Islamists would not suddenly realize there is room in the world after all for Jews and Christians, and Hindus and Buddhists, and New Agers, etc. etc.
Posted by: LJ | Saturday, November 22, 2008 at 12:32 AM
Religion is "ethical alchemy"? Well, we all know where "chemical alchemy" ended up. Ha ha ha ha ha ha!
Posted by: Ed Peters | Saturday, November 22, 2008 at 07:47 AM