FROM the EDITORS:

  • IMPORTANT INFORMATION:
    Opinions expressed on the Insight Scoop weblog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions of Ignatius Press. Links on this weblog to articles do not necessarily imply agreement by the author or by Ignatius Press with the contents of the articles. Links are provided to foster discussion of important issues. Readers should make their own evaluations of the contents of such articles.


NEW & UPCOMING, available from IGNATIUS PRESS

















































































« Can you believe it? The MSM digs atheism | Main | Fr. Robert Spitzer, S.J., stepping down from presidency of Gonzaga »

Thursday, March 20, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b7c369e200e55150bdc48834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Taken to the woodshed:

Comments

Well first of all...
I mean, to say ...
but, but, but to be fair...
Now lets not forget...
On the other hand...


aaah forget it.

Interesting that Peggy Noonan was impressed with Obama's speech. It has been routinely dissected and criticized by most of the right's commentators since he made it. The association with Jeremiah Wright seems to be the trump card that casts doubt on anything Obama has since said.
Obama's self-defence seems to be that everyone is imperfect, including Wright, and he(Obama) doesn't have to agree with the man in order to like him and be his friend.
This is perhaps a variation on what we as Catholics often use as an apologetic when confronted with stock condemnations of the Church. You know the ones; the Crusades, the Inquisition, etc. and most recently the sex abuse scandals.
Obama is rejecting guilt by association, and certainly we have to consider that defence. However, in the case of the Catholic Church, the teaching has never been the issue, only the practice of sinful men. That is our apologetic. That we will defend.
But in Wright's case it is the reverse. No one is claiming he is an evil doer necessarily, but it is his teaching, his doctrine, his dogma that is the issue. Therefore it is relevant that Obama has spent 20 years listening to that teaching because it clearly has the potential to influence how he would be president. That is the job he wants. He may say that it has not affected him but politically he has to say that.

Good points, LJ. One thing about the Obama/Wright story that hasn't been mentioned (if at all), is that if Wright is really, truly angry at people who are trying to destroy blacks, he might want to take a long, hard look at Planned Parenthood, which does a hugely disproportionate amount of "business" in black communities. And, of course, Sen. Obama is an avowed, passionate supporter of PP and abortion in general. Does that upset Rev. Wright as much as, say, Don Imus making racist remarks?

So, according to Ms. Noonan, if one uses 2 words that the average 'Merican doesn't understand, then...one must be right...and intelligent? Maybe it's because she had to go look up the word "endemic" in the Oxford English Dictionary, and had to wikipedia William Faulkner, only to find out that he was not a former British Prime Minister, like she thought. First off, "endemic" is not some ultra-technical term that only the smartest of the smart know; and secondly, Faulkner isn't some obscure Silver Age Roman satirist, that only Ph.D. classicists have read.
"The speech assumed the audience was intelligent. This was a compliment, and I suspect was received as a gift. It also assumed many in the audience were educated. I was grateful for this, as the educated are not much addressed in American politics."
Seriously? If this characterizes educated, God help us!
I think that Ms. Noonan represents the American intellectual decadence, a word used by Ernest Hemingway. Wow, I should run for President!

Stohn: I'll vote for you in fourteen years...

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

WORTHY OF ATTENTION:



















Blogs & Sites We Like

Blog powered by TypePad

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31