"Do Boys Need Dads?" | An IgnatiusInsight.com Interview with Maggie Gallagher
Do Boys Need Dads? An IgnatiusInsight.com Interview with Maggie Gallagher, President of the Institute for Marriage and Public Policy
Do boys need Dads? Decades of sociological research support the common
sense answer, "Yes!" But as the push for "same sex marriage" gains
ground around the world and within the United States, the belief that
both a Mom and a Dad are what’s best for children is becoming a politically incorrect notion in some circles.
A recent book, Raising Boys Without Men: How Maverick Moms Are Creating the Next Generation of Exceptional Men by Peggy Drexler, has been widely praised book for making the case for raising boys without fathers. It has been received favorably in a wide range of magazines, from Harpers’s Bazaar, which labeled it a "Hot Summer Read" to a favorable interview in Parents magazine.
Continue reading...





































































































The answer is "Yes". Next question, please.
Posted by: Mark Brumley | Friday, October 07, 2005 at 12:32 PM
Should boys have two daddies, just like Heather?
Posted by: Carl Olson | Friday, October 07, 2005 at 12:57 PM
Would they both give allowances?
Posted by: fr richard | Friday, October 07, 2005 at 02:13 PM
Aaugh! I didn't realize that Drexler's book was actually getting out that far & wide. I just read a review of it in The Atlantic magazine, which did a great job of addressing the self-congratulatory and anti-straight-man themes of the book. Specifically, the [female] reviewer mentioned that Drexler seems to make the case that straight men are the problem and that boys can grow into decent men w/o any older men in their lives [no matter how much they may deeply long for a father]. I know that many single mothers have probably been forced to raise boys on their own and done well [b/c of divorce, death, infidelity], but boys will always need men to look up to & learn from. The article can be read at:
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200511/raising-fatherless-boys
The reviewer gets to one of the most important consequences of 'families w/o dads needed', in the last couple of chapters. She writes that the greatest event in civilization was probably when men stayed home & committed to one woman & their children, not when boys were no longer raised with a dad.
I also wonder if other people have been kind to Drexler's book b/c they wished to be kind to gay parents, but it's another thing entirely when someone is advocating that fathers [or father figures] are worthless & obsolete. [Ok, I'm finally done.]
Posted by: Ben Swagerty | Friday, October 07, 2005 at 11:56 PM
If it's so obvious to D that boys don't need dads, then might we wonder whether girls really need moms?
Posted by: Ed Peters | Saturday, October 08, 2005 at 07:18 AM
that children were meant to have dad
makes a lady exceedingly sad
for to find one she must
not give into her lust
and try hard to make some fellow glad
Posted by: Patrick Coulton | Saturday, October 08, 2005 at 07:37 AM
So Drexler says, on one hand, that boys are wonderful and great — until they become men. Then they aren't needed. Unless they are homosexual, in which case they are wonderful and great once again. The agenda seems more than a bit obvious...
Posted by: Carl Olson | Saturday, October 08, 2005 at 07:59 AM